Yesterday the EU stated that the EU commission is close on reaching a compromise on the discussed Financial Transaction Tax (FTT). The full Bloomberg article can be found here
It is interesting to note that the EU members remain divided over introducing an FTT, the possible compromise would still be without the UK and the Netherlands participating. The European Banking Union rightfully noted that an introduction of FTT in only some countries of the EU would be inconsistent with the EU efforts to build a capital markets union.
In the States meanwhile, Presidential hopefull Bernie Sanders made FTT a part of his campaign, stating that he would tax 50 cents on every 100 USD traded in equity value to provide better education and shrink trading (effectively killing HFT). According to him, both moves would improve and stabilize the economy. Realistically, it will be a cold day in hell when he gets elected but it does show that FTT is still far from dead and still a great tool for politicians to rally the masses.
Meanwhile it would be good to step away from the rhetoric and look at some studies conducted on the effects of FTT. In our studies collection there is a very interesting study from the University of Duisburg. They looked at Italy where FTT was already introduced and measured its effect. They saw an increase in volatilty and a widening of spreads. Read the article here.
Another interesting document is a study done by the City of London Corporation (perhaps not completely unbiassed). They used another angle and researched how an FTT would affect household savings. That is one of the things that usually gets lost in all the rhetoric of the FTT proponents, at the bottom line it will be the end-client that pays the bill.